Anouk Focquet, DPO Pro Magazine, 2024
This article discusses the concepts of automated decision-making and profiling under the GDPR, thereby also examining the Schufa ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Read more ›Julie Mannekens, Journal RABG 2024/17-18
In this annotation, Julie Mannekens analyses decision 46/2024 of the Belgian Data Protection Authority regarding the processing of customer transaction data by a bank to build models for offering personalized discounts on third-party products and services. Special attention is given to the (nuanced) difference between the assessment of reasonable expectations in the context of the compatibility test for further processing and in the context of legitimate interest as legal basis.
Read more ›Anouk Focquet, Sofie Deprez, Julie Mannekens, Journal Privacy & Personal Data, 2024
This article contains an annotation by Anouk Focquet, Sofie Deprez, and Julie Mannekens on the judgment of the Market Court dated 1 December 2021. The annotation analyses the application of the concept of abuse of rights in relation to the right of access, with reference to the Market Court's judgment and various foreign rulings.
Read more ›Sofie Deprez, Computer Law Journal , 2024/97
This article consists of an annotation on the ECJ judgment of 7 March 2024, 'IAB Europe'. This judgment concerns the scope of the concept of 'personal data' within the meaning of Article 4(1) GDPR, as well as on the qualification of joint controllers.
Read more ›Frank Wijckmans - Emmelie Wijckmans, ICLG, 2024
This Q&A-article guides the reader through the landscape of vertical agreements (distribution and supply relationships) and pays particular attention to the position of dominant firms. This edition includes an important update on the recent Mondelez case, where the European Commission imposed a substantial €337.5 million fine on Mondelez for restricting cross-border sales under both Article 101 and Article 102 TFEU. This case sits at the crossroads of vertical agreements and abuse of dominance, providing critical insights into current regulatory enforcement.
Read more ›Anouk Focquet
This article explains the envisaged structure of the European health data space (‘EHDS’) and specifically discusses how the EHDS Regulation complements and specifies the General Data Protection Regulation (‘GDPR’).
Read more ›Frank Wijckmans & Luc Peeperkorn, ECLR, 2023
In this article, the new EU rules on vertical agreements are analysed. In section 2, the change of policy towards an effects-based approach that took place at the turn of the century is described. Section 3 provides an outline of the new rules and describes what has remained the same since the shift to the effects-based approach. Subsequently, section 4 focuses on the parts of the new rules that have changed compared to the rules of 2010.
Read more ›Anouk Focquet - Karolien Francken - Julie Mannekens - Morgane Smets
This article discusses how to establish a whistleblowing system under the Belgian Whistleblower Act of 28 November 2022.
Read more ›Frank Wijckmans - Emmelie Wijckmans, ICLG, 2023
This article in Q&A format guides the reader through the landscape of vertical agreements (distribution and supply relationships) and pays particular attention to the position of dominant firms. The article takes the new European block exemption regulation (Regulation 2022/720) and the new Vertical Guidelines, as well as the Horizontal Guidelines, fully on board.
Read more ›Frank Wijckmans - Competitio 2023
This article discusses the legal uncertainty for companies as a result of current competition law legislation, due to a prominence of complex economic and legal considerations.
Read more ›Frank Wijckmans - Maaike Visser - Karolien Francken - Monique Sengelov, Manda Wilson, The Law Reviews, 2021
Based on their experience in private damages cases following Commissions cartel decisions, the authors describe the relevant questions that apply to this type of legal actions. The article is intended to provide pragmatic answers to some the challenges presented by private damages claims.
Read more ›Frank Wijckmans - Emmelie Wijckmans, ICLG, 2022
This article in Q&A format guides the reader through the landscape of vertical agreements (distribution and supply relationships) and pays particular attention to the position of dominant firms. The article takes the new European block exemption regulation (Regulation 2022/720) and the new Vertical Guidelines fully on board.
Read more ›Frank Wijckmans - Lise Ryckaert, Competitio, 2021
This article provides an insight into the draft prepared by the European Commission for the new block exemption regulation on vertical agreements. It is particularly helpful to understand the development of the draft towards the definitive texts of Regulation 2022/720 and the new Vertical Guidelines. Some points of criticism reflected in the article have been resolved in the final version of the new legal instruments.
Read more ›Frank Wijckmans - Herlinde Burez, Tijdschrift voor Belgische Mededinging, 2021
Based on Belgian case law, the interpretation of the requirement of conducting an investigation à décharge in competition law is discussed, as well as the possible consequences of a breach by the Auditorate of this duty.
Read more ›Anouk Focquet, Computer Law Journal, 2023/66
This article discusses an annotation on The European Court of Justice judgment of 08/12/2022 regarding the right to erasure of data in the context of search engines. The annotation discusses the preliminary questions answered by the Court concerning (1) the handling of a removal request based on the inaccuracy of the linked information and (2) the scope of the right to erasure when deleting photos displayed as thumbnails in the search results list.
Read more ›Anouk Focquet - Laura Sente, Tijdschrift Privacy & Persoonsgegevens, 2020
This article addresses one of the key topics of the legislation on data protection, notably the right of individuals to review the data that are being kept on him or her. The contribution deals with the question of whether individuals are getting xhat they are entitled to.
Read more ›Frank Wijckmans – Emmelie Wijckmans, Tijdschrift voor Belgische Mededinging, 2016
This article focuses on the policy of "parental liability" in Belgian competition law. It addresses the question of when parent companies are liable for competition infringements of other group companies.
Read more ›Grégoire Ryelandt – Emmelie Wijckmans, Revue de Droit Commercial., 2015
The CJEU case-law is analyzed to determine whether Cartes bancaires is a confirmation, an (r)evolution, or a reversion of the determination of the boundary between agreements by object and those with anti-competitive effects. It then analyses the consequences re: information exchanges and ‘signaling’, and ends with comments on the balance between the protection of the fundamental rights of companies/individuals and the importance of correctly qualifying conduct.
Read more ›Anouk Focquet – Julie Van Pée, Tijdschrift voor Privacy & Persoonsgegevens, 2014
Based on the decision on Facebook by the German competition authority on 06/02/2019, a picture is painted of the relationship between competition and data protection law. The interaction between the two is discussed, as well as how they can reinforce each other.
Read more ›Frank Wijckmans – Filip Tuytschaever, Rechtskundig Weekblad, 2008
This article provides the practicing lawyer with an overview of the main rules of public enforcement and private enforcement of the cartel ban. The Belgian Leniency Notice of 22 October 2007 is explicitly discussed in this context.
Read more ›Frank Wijckmans – Filip Tuytschaever, European Competition Law Review, 2004
This article examines the restrictions on active sales. The analysis aims to provide a roadmap to avoid inadvertent infringements of Article 4(b) of Regulation No 2790/99, thus avoiding the loss of the benefit of the then-current block exemption for the entire agreement.
Read more ›Frank Wijckmans – Filip Tuytschaever, Rechtskundig Weekblad, 2002
The article discusses the conditions under which the ban on active selling is consistent with the (then current) European block exemption. The intention is to provide practitioners with guidance so that they do not lose the benefit of the Block Exemption due to a single inadvertent misstep.
Read more ›
